Many Anti-Semitic dis-info agents like to argue that the Catholic Church and the Jesuits could not be in control of the US Government because Catholics do not believe in abortion and abortion is highly practiced in the US.
Linda Jeffrey, Ed.D. and Colonel Ronald D. Ray, J.D, state in their work A History of the American Law Institutes Model Penal Code, hosted by the website of Dr. Judith Reisman,
“As 21st Century readers well know, when challenging American law, who the judge is has become more important than what the law says. It is no coincidence that obscenity laws were being rewritten and a newly created zone of privacy was being established as a precedent to argue for the killing of the unborn. Here are some interesting facts discovered while researching the seven supreme Court Justices who agreed with Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton on January 22, 1973—Harry Blackmun, (author of the opinion), Potter Stewart, William Douglas, Thurgood Marshall, William Brennan, Warren Burger, and Lewis Powell, and a few others who directly influenced their decisions.
Thomas Clark retired from the supreme Court in 1967, citing a conflict of interest with his son Ramsey Clark, who was appointed Attorney General. However, by the time Roe was decided in 1973, his vote was already cast in the abortion debate, with the publication of his article, “Religion, Morality, and Abortion: A Constitutional Appraisal,” in the Loyola University Law Review in 1969, which was cited by Blackmun in the Roe v. Wade opinion. Clark’s stalwart hostility toward Christianity was recorded in the supreme Court opinion he wrote, Abington v. Schempp, 374 U.S. 203 (1963), which removed prayer and Bible reading from government schools.”
Fourteen States have adopted some form of the ALI statute. See Ark.Stat.Ann. §§ 41-303 to 41-310 (Supp. 1971); Calif.Health & Safety Code §§ 25950-25955.5 (Supp. 1972); Colo.Rev.Stat.Ann. §§ 40-2-50 to 40-2-53 (Cum.Supp. 1967); Del.Code Ann., Tit. 24, §§ 1790-1793 (Supp. 1972); Florida Law of Apr. 13, 1972, c. 72-196, 1972 Fla.Sess.Law Serv., pp. 380-382; Ga.Code §§ 26-1201 to 26-1203 (1972); Kan.Stat.Ann. § 21-3407 (Supp. 1971); Md.Ann.Code, Art. 43, §§ 137-139 (1971); Miss.Code Ann. § 2223 (Supp. 1972); N.M.Stat.Ann. §§ 40A-5-1 to 40A-5-3 (1972); N.C.Gen.Stat. § 14-45.1 (Supp. 1971); Ore.Rev.Stat. §§ 435.405 to 435.495 (1971); S.C.Code Ann. §§ 16-82 to 16-89 (1962 and Supp. 1971); Va.Code Ann. §§ 18.1-62 to 18.1-62.3 (Supp. 1972). Mr. Justice Clark described some of these States as having “led the way.” Religion, Morality, and Abortion: A Constitutional Appraisal, 2 Loyola U. (L.A.) L.Rev. 1, 11 (1969).
This was an interview between Texe Marrs and Edward Hendrie. Edward Hendrie by his own confession (18:00) is a graduate from Notre Dame and earned another degree from a Jesuit law school!!!!!!
During this debate I became nauseous at how obvious it is that these men are disinformation agents to divert the few protestants left into chaos.
At the 3:00 mark Hendrie says, “The Roman Catholic Church is a Crypto Jewish…it is a concealed Jewish Religion…their doctrines however are Jewish…and in essence they are Babylonian because Judaism flows from Babylon…it makes up the pillars of the Roman Catholic Church”.
All my readers know how absolutely ridiculous this is. I have been focusing on this issue for many years. The Roman Catholic religion is a calculated rejection of everything Jewish.
The Synod of Laodicea. Canon XXIX states,
“Christians must not judaize by resting on the Sabbath, but must work on that day, rather honouring the Lord’s Day; and, if they can, resting then as Christians. But if any shall be found to be judaizers, let them be anathema from Christ.”
Medieval Sourcebook: Professions of Faith Extracted from Jews on Baptism says,
“To our most merciful and tranquil lord Recceswinth the King [Visigoth king in the 7th century], from us the Jews of Toledo as witnessed or signed below. We well remember how we were long and rightly constrained to sign this Declaration promising in the name of King Chinthila’s holy memory to support the Catholic faith; and we have done so. However, because our pertinacious lack of faith and the ancient errors of our fathers held us back from believing wholly in Our Lord Jesus Christ or accepting the Catholic truth with all our hearts, we therefore make these promises to your greater glory, on behalf both of ourselves and our wives and children, through this our Declaration, undertaking for the future not to become involved in any Jewish rites or customs nor to associate with the accursed Jews who remain unbaptised. We will not follow our habit of contracting incestuous unions or practising fornication with our own relatives to the sixth degree. We will not on any pretext, either ourselves, our children or our descendants, choose wives from our own race; but in the case of both sexes we will always link ourselves in matrimony with Christians. We will not practise carnal circumcision, or celebrate the Passover, the Sabbath or the other feast days connected with the Jewish religion. We will not keep to our old habit of discrimination in the matter of food. We will do none of the things which the evil tradition of long custom and intercourse urges upon us as Jews. Instead , with utter faith and grace in our hearts, and with complete devotion towards Christ the Son of the Living God, as the apostolic tradition enjoins, shall we believe on Him and confess Him. Every custom of the holy Christian religion, feast days, marriage, and what is lawful to eat, indeed every ceremony thereof, we shall faithfully hold and embrace with all our hearts, reserving no hint within ourselves of resistance, no suspicion of deception, whereby we may come to repeat those errors we now deny, or fulfil with little or no sincerity that which we now promise to do. With regard to swines’ flesh we promise to observe this rule, that if through long custom we are hardly able to eat it, we shall not through fastidiousness or error refuse the things that are cooked with it. And if in all the matters touched on above we are found in any way to transgress, either presuming to work against the Christian Faith, or promising in words to perform actions suitable to the Catholic religion, and in our deeds deferring their performance, we swear by that same Father, Son and Holy Ghost, who is One God in Three, that whoever of us is found to transgress shall either perish by the hands of our fellows, by burning or stoning, or if your splendid piety shall have spared our lives, we shall at once lose our liberty and you shall give us along with all our property to whomever you please into perpetual slavery, or dispose of us in any other manner that seems good to you. To this end you have free authority, not only on account of your royal power, but also arising out of the stipulations of this our guarantee. This Declaration is given at Toledo in the name of the Lord, on the 18th of February in the sixth year of your glorious reign…
‘I renounce all customs, rites, legalisms, unleavened breads and sacrifices of lambs of the Hebrews, and all the other feasts of the Hebrews, sacrifices, prayers, aspersions, purifications, sanctifications and propitiations, and fasts, and new moons, and Sabbaths, and superstitions, and hymns and chants and observances and synagogues, and the food and drink of the Hebrews; in one word, I renounce absolutely everything Jewish.”
Notice that the aversion is to the Torah, not to the Talmud or to the Cabbala. These documents equate the Torah, not the Talmud or the Cabbala with Jewishness. So, the doctrine of the Catholic Church, so far from being Jewish, is a calculated rejection of the Jewish people and the Torah. This was accomplished through replacement theology.
COCC = Catechism of the Catholic Church:
COCC 751 The word “Church” (Latin ecclesia, from the Greek ek-ka-lein, to “call out of”) means a convocation or an assembly. It designates the assemblies of the people, usually for a religious purpose.139 Ekklesia is used frequently in the Greek Old Testament for the assembly of the Chosen People before God, above all for their assembly on Mount Sinai where Israel received the Law and was established by God as his holy people.140By calling itself “Church,” the first community of Christian believers recognized itself as heir to that assembly. In the Church, God is “calling together” his people from all the ends of the earth. The equivalent Greek term Kyriake, from which the English word Church and the German Kirche are derived, means “what belongs to the Lord.”
This is the way the Torah was explained in Christian Churches both Catholic and Protestant for centuries:
“COCC 577 At the beginning of the Sermon on the Mount Jesus issued a solemn warning in which he presented God’s law, given on Sinai during the first covenant, in light of the grace of the New Covenant:
Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets: I have come not to abolish but to fulfil. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth pass away, not one letter, not one stroke of a letter, will pass from the law, until all is accomplished. Therefore, whoever breaks one of the least of these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, will be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever does them and teaches them will be called great in the kingdom of heaven.329
COCC 578 Jesus, Israel’s Messiah and therefore the greatest in the kingdom of heaven, was to fulfil the Law by keeping it in its all embracing detail – according to his own words, down to “the least of these commandments”.330 He is in fact the only one who could keep it perfectly.331 On their own admission the Jews were never able to observe the Law in its entirety without violating the least of its precepts.332This is why every year on the Day of Atonement the children of Israel ask God’s forgiveness for their transgressions of the Law. the Law indeed makes up one inseparable whole, and St. James recalls, “Whoever keeps the whole law but fails in one point has become guilty of all of it.”333
COCC 1962 The Old Law is the first stage of revealed Law. Its moral prescriptions are summed up in the Ten Commandments. the precepts of the Decalogue lay the foundations for the vocation of man fashioned in the image of God; they prohibit what is contrary to the love of God and neighbor and prescribe what is essential to it. The Decalogue is a light offered to the conscience of every man to make God’s call and ways known to him and to protect him against evil:
God wrote on the tables of the Law what men did not read in their hearts.13”
This is all a game though because the Sabbath is not kept in this Church and the name of Yahuwah is not spoken by its people. So they believe neither the third nor the fourth commandments. Also, the law was kept. Luk 1:6.
However, the catholic church would invent another category of law in order to justify their disobedience to most of the Bible: ceremonial law.
COCC 582 Going even further, Jesus perfects the dietary law, so important in Jewish daily life, by revealing its pedagogical meaning through a divine interpretation: “Whatever goes into a man from outside cannot defile him. . . (Thus he declared all foods clean.). . . What comes out of a man is what defiles a man. For from within, out of the heart of man, come evil thoughts. . .”346 In presenting with divine authority the definitive interpretation of the Law, Jesus found himself confronted by certain teachers of the Law who did not accept his interpretation of the Law, guaranteed though it was by the divine signs that accompanied it.347 This was the case especially with the sabbath laws, for he recalls, often with rabbinical arguments, that the sabbath rest is not violated by serving God and neighbour,348 which his own healings did.
This phrase “Thus he declared all foods clean” is not in the bible.
Notice the italicized words here. The argument is that καθαρίζων must mean “He declared” clean due to its masculine construction instead of neuter. The Christian is relying on a textual variant. The problem is, the way the Christian translates the passage the word καθαρίζων must be considered an adjective, but the word is a verb. Cleansing and declared clean are very different uses of the word clean. The former is a verb, the latter is an adjective while declared is the verb. Also take into account the cross reference in Mat 15:17 and the curious absence of the statement, “Thus he declared he declared all foods clean”.
This proves that the Protestants are still in a partial league with the Roman Church. I say this having endured years of emotionally excruciating study: This is why the Reformation failed.
COCC 2174 Jesus rose from the dead “on the first day of the week.”104 Because it is the “first day,” the day of Christ’s Resurrection recalls the first creation. Because it is the “eighth day” following the sabbath,105 it symbolizes the new creation ushered in by Christ’s Resurrection. For Christians it has become the first of all days, the first of all feasts, the Lord’s Day (he kuriake hemera, dies dominica) Sunday:
We all gather on the day of the sun, for it is the first day [after the Jewish sabbath, but also the first day] when God, separating matter from darkness, made the world; and on this same day Jesus Christ our Savior rose from the dead.106
First of all, he did not rise from the dead on the first day of the week. The preparation day on which Messiah died was related to the Passover not the weekly Sabbath; thus it was not Friday.( John19:14-15) Secondly, the only passage that seems to state (though the wording is not clear) that Messiah rose from the dead on Sunday is Mark 16:9. However, this passage is not in the oldest Greek text Codex Sinaiticus. The fact is, Messiah stated clearly that he would be in the grave 3 days and 3 nights. Mat. 12:40. This is impossible with the Friday to Sunday view of the heretical Christian Church. Secondly, the sun worship is clearly stated which has served as the basis for the Solar calendars of Christianity who so ridiculously state that the sun is in the center of the universe and that the earth revolves around the sun directly contrary to Psalm 93:1.
COCC 2175 Sunday is expressly distinguished from the sabbath which it follows chronologically every week; for Christians its ceremonial observance replaces that of the sabbath. In Christ’s Passover, Sunday fulfills the spiritual truth of the Jewish sabbath and announces man’s eternal rest in God. For worship under the Law prepared for the mystery of Christ, and what was done there prefigured some aspects of Christ:107
Those who lived according to the old order of things have come to a new hope, no longer keeping the sabbath, but the Lord’s Day, in which our life is blessed by him and by his death.108
2176 The celebration of Sunday observes the moral commandment inscribed by nature in the human heart to render to God an outward, visible, public, and regular worship “as a sign of his universal beneficence to all.”109 Sunday worship fulfills the moral command of the Old Covenant, taking up its rhythm and spirit in the weekly celebration of the Creator and Redeemer of his people”
2177 The Sunday celebration of the Lord’s Day and his Eucharist is at the heart of the Church’s life. “Sunday is the day on which the paschal mystery is celebrated in light of the apostolic tradition and is to be observed as the foremost holy day of obligation in the universal Church.”110
“Also to be observed are the day of the Nativity of Our Lord Jesus Christ,
the Epiphany,
the Ascension of Christ,
the feast of the Body and Blood of Christi,
the feast of Mary the Mother of God,
her Immaculate Conception,
her Assumption,
the feast of Saint Joseph,
the feast of the Apostles Saints Peter and Paul, and the feast of All Saints.”111
COCC 1339 Jesus chose the time of Passover to fulfill what he had announced at Capernaum: giving his disciples his Body and his Blood:
Then came the day of Unleavened Bread, on which the passover lamb had to be sacrificed. So Jesus sent Peter and John, saying, “Go and prepare the passover meal for us, that we may eat it….” They went … and prepared the passover. and when the hour came, he sat at table, and the apostles with him. and he said to them, “I have earnestly desired to eat this passover with you before I suffer; for I tell you I shall not eat it again until it is fulfilled in the kingdom of God.”…. and he took bread, and when he had given thanks he broke it and gave it to them, saying, “This is my body which is given for you. Do this in remembrance of me.” and likewise the cup after supper, saying, “This cup which is poured out for you is the New Covenant in my blood.”164
1340 By celebrating the Last Supper with his apostles in the course of the Passover meal, Jesus gave the Jewish Passover its definitive meaning. Jesus’ passing over to his father by his death and Resurrection, the new Passover, is anticipated in the Supper and celebrated in the Eucharist, which fulfills the Jewish Passover and anticipates the final Passover of the Church in the glory of the kingdom.
So here we see the Catholic church doing everything it can, not to adopt the Jewish faith, but to replace it with its own Greco-Roman inventions. The renewed Covenant of Jer.31:31-32 will be replaced by Christianity’s New Testament. The Nation of Israel will be replaced by the Church. The Hebrew Gospels and the Hebrew writings of Rav Shaul, (which is admitted by The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis.Nazoraeans, 29. Against Nazoraeans 9,4; Eusebius, Church History, Book III, Chapter 24, 6; Chapter 38, 2; Chapter 39, 16; Book V, Chapter 10, 3; Book VI, Chapter 14, 2; and Jerome, Lives of Illustrious Men, Chapters III and V) will be replaced by Greek Manuscripts. The Unitarianism of the Tanach will be replaced by the pagan Triune Godhead of Christianity which ultimately worships a monad huperousia pursuant to Plotinus’ Enneads 6 and 9 (See here). Following from this the Hebrew names of the creator and the messiah, Yahuwah and Yehoshuwah will be replaced by a Generic title: God, and the Greek deity Iasus later to be translated Jesus. The Torah and all the hundreds of relational, political and economic laws revealed by Yahuwah himself will be replaced by Pagan Monasticism, Asceticism, Canon Law and Feudalism. The Sabbath day which was sanctified and blessed by Yahuwah in the second chapter of the Bible as an integral part of the created order, will be replaced by the day of the Sun. The annual Sabbaths of the fall and spring feasts will be replaced by the Catholic Church’s liturgical calendar, celebrating the Bohemian pagan Christmas, the Epiphany, the Ascension of Christ, the feast of the Body and Blood of Christi, the feast of Mary the Mother of God, her Immaculate Conception, her Assumption, the feast of Saint Joseph, the feast of the Apostles Saints Peter and Paul, and the feast of All Saints which is known today as the pagan celebration of Halloween, etc. The Protestants, following Rome’s Replacement theology would still replace these feasts with their innovation known as The Lord’s Supper. Following from this, the creator’s calendar, which measures years by the ripe barley, the abib, and holding to Geocentrism, will be replaced by the Solar Calendars of Christianity and Jesuit Heliocentrism. This religion would go on to justify prayer and worship to idols and statues and trinkets and a legion of other grotesque and abominable insanities explicitly condemned in the Torah.
Truly in one word this religion would renounce absolutely everything Jewish.
For this man to even begin to claim that the Catholic Church derived their religion from Judaism is so heinous, so dark and malicious a deceit as to belie reason.
And to any Protestant Christians looking on, in order to believe the Jewish Hebrew Bible and the Jewish Hebrew Messiah you cannot be Christian. As we have seen, all Christian thinking operates off of Rome’s Replacement Theology. The Protestants in the Augsburg Confession actually admit some of this.
According to the Roman Catholic Council of Trent’s 17th session, the Protestant Reformation was being seriously considered until the speech by Archbishop Reggio pointed out that the Church’s change of the Sabbath from Saturday to Sunday was indicative of her authority over the scripture. (History of the Council of Trent by Félix Bungener, pg. 298.) The Augsburg Confession repeats this Roman Catholic argument in Article XXVIII: Of Ecclesiastical Power,
“They [The Roman Catholics-DS] refer to the Sabbath-day as having been changed into the Lord’s Day, contrary to the Decalog, as it seems. Neither is there any example whereof they make more than concerning the changing of the Sabbath-day. Great, say they, is the power of the Church, since it has dispensed with one of the Ten Commandments!”
TheRapeOfJustice states,
“Eric Jon Phelps is a racist”
>>>The word racist is a bible hating communist term first popularized by famous Marxist by Leon Trotsky. In his 1930 work The History of the Russian Revolution, Volume 1, Chapter 1, page 5 we read,
“Slavophilism, the messianism of backwardness, has based its philosophy upon the assumption that the Russian people and their church are democratic through and through, whereas official Russia is a German bureaucracy imposed upon them by Peter the Great. Marx remarked upon this theme: “In the same way the Teutonic jackasses blamed the despotism of Frederick the Second upon the French, as though backward slaves were not always in need of civilised slaves to train them.” This brief comment completely finishes off not only the old philosophy of the Slavophiles, but also the latest revelations of the “Racists.”
MLK was operating right off Engels’ Communist Catechism. Engels states in his The Principles of Communism 1847,
“— 22 —
What will be the attitude of communism to existing nationalities?
The nationalities of the peoples associating themselves in accordance with the principle of community will be compelled to mingle with each other as a result of this association and thereby to dissolve themselves, just as the various estate and class distinctions must disappear through the abolition of their basis, private property.”
Racial integration was a direct sociological application of Marx and Engels’ views of Property.
The Bible teaches racial separation in Gen. 9-11 and teaches the subjugation of the black Hamitic race.
That is not my interpretation, that is the exact wording of Jasher:
73:33 For Moses remembered how Abraham had made his servant Eliezer swear, saying unto him, Thou shalt not take a woman from the daughters of Canaan for my son Isaac.34 Also what Isaac did when Jacob had fled from his brother, when he commanded him, saying, Thou shalt not take a wife from the daughters of Canaan, nor make alliance with any of the children of Ham. 35 For the Lord our God gave Ham the son of Noah, and his children and all his seed, as slaves to the children of Shem and to the children of Japheth, and unto their seed after them for slaves, forever.
John 5:42 but I know you, that you do not have the love of God in yourselves. …
———-
“a Zionist”
>>>EJP does not support the Israeli government. He supports the racial seed of Abraham’s right to the Land Yahuwah gave to them. I see no way around his argument but the replacement theology of Catholicism.
“and an Israeli blood diamond trader”
>>>Can you show me the connection between Eric’s business and the De Beers company or any concrete crime? I don’t want your assumed categorical condemnation of an industry I want a connection to a particular crime and EJP’s business. I don’t see anywhere in the bible where it says you cannot sell diamonds. I just have never read that…
“Frank led a satanic heresy against Judaism, and the ones who have read the books and articles by Rabbi Antelman, Rabbi W. Gunther Plaut, Henry Makow, Cliff Shack, Dietrich Bronder and Chistopher Jon Bjerknes are well informed about the Frankist roots of Nazism, Fascism, Communism, Socialism and National-Socialism.”
>>> So the conspiracy was against the Jews. Thank you! The origin of Communism was Catholic Monasticism. In the New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia, in its article entitled, “Poverty” we read,
“The express vow of renunciation of all private property was introduced into the profession of the Friars Minor in 1260. About the same time another change took place; hitherto no limit had been placed on the common possessions of religious, but the mendicant orders in the thirteenth century forbade the possession, even in common, of all immovable property distinct from the convent, and of all revenues; and the Friars Minor of the strict observance, desiring to go one step further, assigned to the Holy See the ownership of all their property, even the most indispensable. Following the example of St. Francis and St. Dominic, many founders established their orders on a basis of common poverty, and the Church saw a large increase in the number of the mendicant orders until the foundation of theclerks regular in the sixteenth century; even then, many orders united common poverty with the regular clerical life: such were the Theatines (1524), whose rule was to live on alms and contributions spontaneously given; and the Society of Jesus (1540). It soon became evident that this profession of poverty which had so greatly edified the thirteenth century was exposed to grave abuses, that a certain state of destitution created more cares than it removed, and was not conducive either to intellectual activity or to strict observance; and that mendicity might become an occasion of scandal. Consequently the Council of Trent(Sess. XXV, c. iii, de reg.) permitted all monasteries, except those of the Friars Minor Observantines and the Capuchins, to possess immovable property, and consequently the income derived therefrom; but the Carmelites and the Society of Jesus, in its professed houses, continue to practise the common poverty which forbids the possession of assured incomes.”
“The second thing that is competent to man with regard to external things is their use. On this respect man ought to possess external things, not as his own, but as common, so that, to wit, he is ready to communicate them to others in their need. Hence the Apostle says (1 Timothy 6:17-18): “Charge the rich of this world. . . to give easily, to communicate to others,” etc.
Reply to Objection 1. Community of goods is ascribed to the natural law, not that the natural law dictates that all things should be possessed in common and that nothing should be possessed as one’s own: but because the division of possessions is not according to the natural law, but rather arose from human agreement which belongs to positive law, as stated above (57, 2,3). Hence the ownership of possessions is not contrary to the natural law, but an addition thereto devised by human reason.
Reply to Objection 2. A man would not act unlawfully if by going beforehand to the play he prepared the way for others: but he acts unlawfully if by so doing he hinders others from going. On like manner a rich man does not act unlawfully if he anticipates someone in taking possession of something which at first was common property, and gives others a share: but he sins if he excludes others indiscriminately from using it. Hence Basil says (Hom. in Luc. xii, 18): “Why are you rich while another is poor, unless it be that you may have the merit of a good stewardship, and he the reward of patience?”
“On the contrary, In cases of need all things are common property, so that there would seem to be no sin in taking another’s property, for need has made it common.”
Ibid., Article 7
Sir Thomas More’s Utopia 1516 continued the process. The Jesuits perfected communism in their Reductions in Paraguay. Even the New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia admits in its article “Reductions of Paraguay”,
“(1) Conditions of Property
The economic basis was a sort of communism…The land and all that stood upon it was the property of the community. The land was apportioned among the caciques, who allotted it to the families under them. Agricultural instruments and draught-cattle were loaned from the common supply. No one was permitted to sell his plot of land or his house, called abamba, i.e. “own possession.” The individual efforts of the Indians, owing to their indolence, soon proved to be inadequate, whereupon separate plots were set aside as common fields, called Tupamba, i.e. “God’s property” which were cultivated by common labour under the guidance of the Padres. The products of these fields were placed in the common storehouse, and were used partly for the support of the poor, the sick, widows, orphans,Church Indians, etc., partly as seed for the next year, partly as reserve supply for unforeseen contingencies, and also as a medium of exchange for European goods and for taxes (see below). The yield of the private fields and of private effort became the absolute property of the Indians, and was credited to them individually in the common barter transactions, so that each received in exchange the goods he desired. Those abamba plots which gave a smaller yield because of faulty individual management were exchanged from time to time. The herds of livestock were also common property. The caballos del Santo, which were used in processions on festal occasions, were especially reserved. Thus the Reduction Los Santos Apostoles at one time owned 599 of these.”
Karl Marx was controlled by a Jesuit named Father Beck as Marx admits,
“Bismarck complained in his North German Gazette that I was in league with Father Beck, the leader of the Jesuit movement, and that we were keeping the socialist movement in such a condition that he could do nothing with it.”https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/bio/media/marx/79_01_05.htm
For a comprehensive dismantling of Christian Theology see here: nhttps://sites.google.com/a/thekingsparlor.com/natsarim-nation/should-christians-keep-the-sabbath
-1-.jpg)
Anglo Judaizer 