Pope says communists are closet Christians Sunday, Jun 29 2014 

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/06/29/us-pope-communism-idUSKBN0F40L020140629

Pope Francis calling for one world communism Sunday, May 11 2014 

http://time.com/94264/pope-francis-redistribute-wealth/

Israel Continuing to Submit to the Vatican; Jews do not control the NWO Tuesday, May 6 2014 

http://www.infowars.com/israel-wants-to-give-mount-zion-and-the-tomb-of-david-to-the-vatican/

Yes the Jesuits are Behind Abortion Too Anti-Semites Monday, Feb 3 2014 

Many Anti-Semitic dis-info agents like to argue that the Catholic Church and the Jesuits could not be in control of the US Government because Catholics do not believe in abortion and abortion is highly practiced in the US.

Linda Jeffrey, Ed.D. and Colonel Ronald D. Ray, J.D, state in their work A History of the American Law Institutes Model Penal Code, hosted by the website of Dr. Judith Reisman,

“As 21st Century readers well know, when challenging American law, who the judge is has become more important than what the law says. It is no coincidence that obscenity laws were being rewritten and a newly created zone of privacy was being established as a precedent to argue for the killing of the unborn. Here are some interesting facts discovered while researching the seven supreme Court Justices who agreed with Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton on January 22, 1973—Harry Blackmun, (author of the opinion), Potter Stewart, William Douglas, Thurgood Marshall, William Brennan, Warren Burger, and Lewis Powell, and a few others who directly influenced their decisions.

Thomas Clark retired from the supreme Court in 1967, citing a conflict of interest with his son Ramsey Clark, who was appointed Attorney General. However, by the time Roe was decided in 1973, his vote was already cast in the abortion debate, with the publication of his article, “Religion, Morality, and Abortion: A Constitutional Appraisal,” in the Loyola University Law Review in 1969, which was cited by Blackmun in the Roe v. Wade opinion. Clark’s stalwart hostility toward Christianity was recorded in the supreme Court opinion he wrote, Abington v. Schempp, 374 U.S. 203 (1963), which removed prayer and Bible reading from government schools.”

http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/monograph_opt.pdf

This citation can be read in Footnote 37 of Roe v. Wade – 410 U.S. 113 (1973).

http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/410/113/case.html#F37

[Footnote 37]

Fourteen States have adopted some form of the ALI statute. See Ark.Stat.Ann. §§ 41-303 to 41-310 (Supp. 1971); Calif.Health & Safety Code §§ 25950-25955.5 (Supp. 1972); Colo.Rev.Stat.Ann. §§ 40-2-50 to 40-2-53 (Cum.Supp. 1967); Del.Code Ann., Tit. 24, §§ 1790-1793 (Supp. 1972); Florida Law of Apr. 13, 1972, c. 72-196, 1972 Fla.Sess.Law Serv., pp. 380-382; Ga.Code §§ 26-1201 to 26-1203 (1972); Kan.Stat.Ann. § 21-3407 (Supp. 1971); Md.Ann.Code, Art. 43, §§ 137-139 (1971); Miss.Code Ann. § 2223 (Supp. 1972); N.M.Stat.Ann. §§ 40A-5-1 to 40A-5-3 (1972); N.C.Gen.Stat. § 14-45.1 (Supp. 1971); Ore.Rev.Stat. §§ 435.405 to 435.495 (1971); S.C.Code Ann. §§ 16-82 to 16-89 (1962 and Supp. 1971); Va.Code Ann. §§ 18.1-62 to 18.1-62.3 (Supp. 1972). Mr. Justice Clark described some of these States as having “led the way.” Religion, Morality, and Abortion: A Constitutional Appraisal, 2 Loyola U. (L.A.) L.Rev. 1, 11 (1969).

The actual article can be read here:

http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1150&context=llr

where we see Mr. Clark, being enabled by the Jesuit School of Loyola to argue for the reception of new abortion laws which ultimately succeeded.

Rothschild Family; the Vatican Bankers Tuesday, Jan 28 2014 

The Jewish Encyclopedia states,

“It is a somewhat curious sequel to the attempt to set up a Catholic competitor to the Roths-childs that at the present time the latter are the guardians of the papal treasure.”

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/12909-rothschild

Justified Genocide; Chronicles of Southern Reconstruction Monday, Jan 20 2014 

Texe Marrs vs. EJP Monday, Jan 6 2014 

http://truthseeker247works365.blogspot.com/2008/12/eric-jon-phelps-vs-texe-marrs-email.html

Reply to Matthew Heimbach’s “Labor and Tradition: Dump the Bosses Off Your Back” Wednesday, Dec 4 2013 

http://www.tradyouth.org/2013/12/labor-and-tradition-dump-the-bosses-off-your-back/#comment-10264

Matt,

“The working class has been fighting for a living wage and bearable working conditions for centuries. While Europe prior to the advance of capitalism had believed in the importance of the elites having a “nobles obligation” to the lower classes to provide for them a survivable wage, infrastructure, and other needs, the modern class war is one of “every man for himself.”

>>>Yet the Feudal Noble-Serf Dialectic is exactly what Europe rejected in the rise of Communism. The Communist Manifesto states,

“The modern bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones.”

http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch01.htm#007

“The redefining of a nation from a folk and community to that of a “social contract” business arrangement creates a tyranny of the rich over the working class.”

>>>And an open door to racial integration.

“A society cannot survive as the Communists would have it, with the working class overthrowing the elites. A society also cannot survive when the elites betray their God-given mission to be proper stewards. A nation will survive and thrive when the elites and the blue collar can unite, hand-in-hand, and work together to build a better nation for all walks of life.”

>>>Agreed which is why your Feudal construction will not work. The Feudal society was a calculated rejection of the Bible.

“Bishop Adalbero of Laon: The Tripartite Society…For human law distinguishes two classes. Nobles and serfs, indeed, are not governed by the same ordinance…The other class is that of the serfs. This luckless breed possesses nothing except at the cost of its own labour…[Footnote: Jacques Le Goff, Medieval Civilization, trans. Julia Barrow (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990), 255]” (pg. 221)

This is a deliberate and calculated rejection of the Bible: Num. 15:15-29

“America is a ultimate expression of the decline of the unity between the elites and working class. In a revolution that dismantled centuries of monarchy and the Church ruling over the society, Freemasons and capitalists were able to Shanghai millions of colonists into embracing the identity of America. The American identity is one not forged in blood, history, race, or theology, but one based on the worship of the Almighty Dollar.”

>>>Agreed

“The working class in America has always struggled under the weight of taxes and regulation which make moving up socially and economically very difficult. The control of “old money” over the affairs both social and economic of State’s and the nation ensure that democracy and equal protection under the law are little more than words tossed out to placate the masses.”

>>>I am going to need to see some statistics on that in order to believe it. Before the Yankee invasion, the South was a Utopia for a Freeman and a Yeoman farmer. Even after the 14th Amendment we still had In esse and sui juris status-right to our wages for labor.

“While a poor man who steals fifty dollars from a liquor store might get ten years in prison, banksters who loot billions from hardworking pensioners will get house arrest in his sprawling mansion.”

>>>This is a result of Christian Theology. Christianity did away with the Torah and thus its usury laws. The Catholic Church’s feigned half obedience to this command before the rise of mercantilism and into the Renaissance period and its subsequent ultimate compromise with usury shows just how spineless and illogical Christian Theology is. Not to mention the jubilee laws.

“The work towards living wages and safety standards for the working class in the 19th and 20th century were not polite political struggles, they were outright wars. The labor struggle was led by various factions of working organizations such as the more radical I.W.W (the Wobblies), the United Mine Workers, the American Federation of Labor, and other smaller factions ranging from Communist organizations to labor organizations with fascist undertones. The American labor movement was far from a united front, a fact that the bosses and government took advantage of.”

>>>Too much industrialization. The farm life avoids most of this. The Industrial city life is a den of thieves and corruption. Domestic production should be focused on instead of factory production. The Cultural Marxists don’t like the sound of this because they know it unites the family too much and takes the children away from their Marxist training centers.

“Just as the modern White Nationalist and Traditionalist movement struggles with infighting”

>>>Isn’t it obvious that Christianity cannot produce a unified system of philosophy yet? We have tens of thousands of religious factions here and growing daily.

“Communists, anarchists, and other Socialist organizations were even “White Supremacist” by modern standards, by supporting immigration controls and advocating almost entirely for White workers. Almost without exception, until the latter half of the 20th century, organized labor and unions were endeavors with a wide spectrum of beliefs, but were almost exclusively a White affair.”

>>>I cannot distinguish a single principle you hold from Nazism Matt. I fear for your soul. You tell people you are a traditional southerner. Nazism has nothing whatsoever to do with the South. NOTHING!!!!!!!!!

“The “moderate” wing of the American labor movement, much like the conservatives of the modern era, were far more interested in the respect of the System and financial benefits, than actually helping the workers. The American Federation of Labor under international Jew Samuel Gompers continually betrayed the men and women who were literally having their skulls cracked by company thugs and police officers.”

>>>Then go out to the country and build a farm. Why do we have to maintain the Capitalist-Communist Dialectic? The Industrial Revolution is done here anyway. We cannot compete with China Industrially with the labor laws we have here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0VjwU8cWEw

“It should strike a familiar chord with modern Traditionalists where Jewish money and Jewish leadership works to create a false opposition. The System gives respect to that organization, but the values they are supposed to hold to are never met. Contemporary kosher conservatives who betray Christian values at the behest of their Jewish masters are simply the next incarnation of a political movement for the best interests of White Americans.”

>>>What organization? The men I see getting rich are the Knights of Malta and the Chinese. The men who dominate the banks in America are Knights of Malta. The men who run the European Union are Catholics.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jos%C3%A9_Manuel_Barroso

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herman_Van_Rompuy

The Rothschild family is well known to be the Vatican Bankers. The people who dominate industry are Chinese. So please help me to see what you are seeing. Do you have anything which lists all the Jews who control the world who are not beholden to the Pope?

“either a communist or a fascist, because the “free market” taken to its logical extreme is the embodiment of greed and evil.”

>>>Preach!

“(although I am sure that Blackwater would love the job)”

>>>Oh, those Catholic Knights of Malta; those crusading murderers!

“instead of unions working to improve the pay and conditions for the working class.”

>>>That is never going to work. Go to the country and build a farm.

1.When the Union strikes against his employer, the employer’s costs go up, and thus prices go up and his leisure activities go down. But wait! Those leisure activities are provided by common hireling workers. Thus, in their desire to fight for the common hireling worker, the Union persecutes common hireling workers.

2. Unless a Union is willing to resort to violence, other workers are sought by the employer to fulfill the positions the striking Union refuse to take, leaving the family of this striking Union helpless and out in the cold.

3. If the Union is willing to resort to violence they, in their hypocritical desire to fight for the rights of labor refuse the rights of labor for those they call scabs.

4. This denial of others the right to work creates an aristocracy of rights, a monopoly of labor, among the Union. They become just like the people they say they hate. HYPOCRITES!

5. The backfire of Unions is if other labor forces such as agriculture could unite to strike, they could drive up the costs of food and thus negate the success the Factory Union had with their employers by raising their wages. The new wage is wasted on more expensive food.

6. But agricultural laborers do not have the ability to create a union, and thus the factory Unionists have a monopoly on the right to Unionize and Strike.

7. These Union strikes then do not affect the employers nearly as much as their fellow citizen. When a Union strikes, the demands force the Employer’s costs up, which forces him to raise costs on his products. This then raises the price of goods on the Union’s fellow common laborers outside the factory.

8. When a Union is formed it must have the authority to command its members to abstain from work and furnish subsistence to their members during a strike. What else is this subordination and dependence but slavery?

9. If the Communist appeals to the idea of Nationalizing the employers and making the Government the employer, the inevitable result will be a representative of Government compelling everyone to perform their share of labor. What else is this but slavery?

“We must demand and seize the dignity of a living wage and the future of a new nation here on the North American continent, for our people, and by our people. Compromise with the System will only leave you in hovels surrounded by Third World invaders as the politicians and business elites sit in mansions upon a hill. It is not time to beg scraps off of their table, it is to toss over the table and remove our support from their rigged economic System and their perverted Judeo/Masonic “nation” and create a Home just for us.”

>>>Judeo Masonic? You do know that the Bible was written by Jews right? You do know that the Mesiah was a Jew right? You do know that Masonry is Catholic? It is based on Catholic orders and was created by Jesuits to regain the Stuart Throne in England right?

What better way to overthrow this system than to move out to the country and start a farm instead of this constant, never ending fawning after the Industrial Towers of Babel?

Christian Theology; The Root of the Nazi Holocaust Thursday, Oct 10 2013 

Western Civilization: Ideas, Politics, and Society, Volume I: To 1789, by Marvin Perry (Author), Myrna Chase (Author), James Jacob (Author), Margaret Jacob (Author), Theodore H. Von Laue (Author) (Wadsworth: Boston, MA, 2013, 2009),

“Holding the Jews responsible for the Black Death, Christians committed mass murder. In Basel, several hundred Jews were herded into a wooden house and burned to death. Some six thousand Jews were burned alive in Mainz. Flames consumed another two thousand in a huge pyre outside Strasbourg, and their property was distributed to the local townspeople. In this picture depicting the slaughter of the Jews of Strasbourg, the townspeople evidently enjoy the spectacle.” (pg. 252)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Death_Jewish_persecutions

The Canons of the Fourth Lateran Council, 1215, CANON 68

“Summary. Jews and Saracens of both sexes in every Christian province must be distinguished from the Christian by a difference of dress. On Passion Sunday and the last three days of Holy Week they may not appear in public.

Text: In some provinces a difference in dress distinguishes the Jews or Saracens from the Christians, but in certain others such a confusion has grown up that they cannot be distinguished by any difference. Thus it happens at times that through error Christians have relations with the women of Jews or Saracens, and Jews and Saracens with Christian women. Therefore, that they may not, under pretext of error of this sort, excuse themselves in the future for the excesses of such prohibited intercourse, we decree that such Jews and Saracens of both sexes in every Christian province and at all times shall be marked off in the eyes of the public from other peoples through the character of their dress. Particularly, since it may be read in the writings of Moses [Numbers 15:37-41], that this very law has been enjoined upon them.

Moreover, during the last three days before Easter and especially on Good Friday, they shall not go forth in public at all, for the reason that some of them on these very days, as we hear, do not blush to go forth better dressed and are not afraid to mock the Christians who maintain the memory of the most holy Passion by wearing signs of mourning.

This, however, we forbid most severely, that any one should presume at all to break forth in insult to the Redeemer. And since we ought not to ignore any insult to Him who blotted out our disgraceful deeds, we command that such impudent fellows be checked by the secular princes by imposing them proper punishment so that they shall not at all presume to blaspheme Him who was crucified for us.

[Note by Schroeder: In 581 the Synod of Macon enacted in canon 14 that from Thursday in Holy Week until Easter Sunday, .Jews may not in accordance with a decision of King Childebert appear in the streets and in public places. Mansi, IX, 934; Hefele-Leclercq, 111, 204. In 1227 the Synod of Narbonne in canon 3 ruled: “That Jews may be distinguished from others, we decree and emphatically command that in the center of the breast (of their garments) they shall wear an oval badge, the measure of one finger in width and one half a palm in height. We forbid them moreover, to work publicly on Sundays and on festivals. And lest they scandalize Christians or be scandalized by Christians, we wish and ordain that during Holy Week they shall not leave their houses at all except in case of urgent necessity, and the prelates shall during that week especially have them guarded from vexation by the Christians.” Mansi, XXIII, 22; Hefele-Leclercq V 1453. Many decrees similar to these in content were issued by synods before and after this Lateran Council. Hefele-Leclercq, V and VI; Grayzel, The Church and the Jews in the XIlIth Century, Philadelphia, 1933.]

http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/basis/lateran4.asp

The Anti-Jewish Jesuits Tuesday, Oct 1 2013 

A popular disinformation technique used by the Metternichians, is to excuse the Jesuits from dialogue due to their infiltration by Jews. When men like EJP or myself complain that the Jesuits are at the top of the NWO pyramid Metternichians claim that Jesuits are pro-jew and that the Jesuits are controlled by Jews. The documentation contradicts this claim.

Behind the Dictators A Factual Analysis of the Relationship of Nazi-Fascism and Roman Catholicism By Leo H. Lehmann

“The Jesuit Order has its “Aryan paragraph” corresponding exactly to that of Hitlerism. Its Constitutions contain six impediments against reception into the Order, the first of which is Jewish descent up to the fourth generation. If Jewish descent is discovered after a candidate’s admission, it prevents his “radiation.” This Aryan paragraph first appeared in the statutes of the Order in 1593, was confirmed in 1608 and is to be found in the latest official edition published in Florence in 1893. General councils of the order have many times proclaimed that Jewish descent must be considered as “an impurity, scandal, dishonor and infamy.” Suarez, noted Jesuit theologican, also states that Jewish descent is an impurity of such indelible character that it is sufficient to prevent admission into the Order…

[Footnotes] Institutum 8. J., p. 278, 302; also Jesuit Lexicon, p. 939.

F. Suarez, Tractatus de religione Societatis Jesu, p. 34.”

(Pg. 25)

%d bloggers like this: