The men behind the Uncivil Rights Legislation were Jesuits.
https://eternalpropositions.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/randolph.jpg
In this famous picture of the men behind the uncivil rights movement we have the black leaders and our court Jew Rabbi Joachim Prinz [a personal acquaintance of SS/SD Adolf Eichmann while in Vienna and chairman of the American Jewish Congress which, under Reformed Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, betrayed European Jews by refusing to aid in their escape from Nazi-occupied Europe], but the man behind all these men is a Jesuit named John Lafarge Jr.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_LaFarge,_Jr.
He was the mentor of Randolph who was the mentor of King.
David Southern, John LaFarge and the Limits of Catholic Interracialism, 1911-1963, http://books.google.com/books?id=uHr7k5iNUi4C&printsec=frontcover&dq=John+LaFarge+and+the+Limits+of+Catholic+Interracialism&hl=en&sa=X&ei=vFeMUKu1HYG69gSY8oDABw&ved=0CC8Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false
Then we have Theodore Hesburgh, Civil Rights Commission-member and President of Notre Dame University (Not in the above picture). He wrote the actual legislation that has so destroyed us here.
Racial Liberation theology was created by the Jesuits in the 18th century. In The Footprints of the Jesuits by R.W. Thompson we read on page 186 of the Jesuit Reductions and their treatment of the Natives of Paraguay,
“After alleging that the power of the Jesuits had so increased as to render it evident that there must be war between them and the Government in Paraguay, it [A statement of grievances by the Portuguese Government-DS] proceeds to affirm “that they were laboring sedulously to undermine the good understanding existing between the Governments of Portugal and Spain,” and that “their machinations were carried on from the Plata to the Rio Grande.” It then embodies in a few expressive words, as given by the Jesuit Weld, these serious charges: “That they had under them thirty-one great populations, producing immense riches to the society, while the people themselves were kept in the most miserable slavery; that no Spaniard or Portuguese, were he even governor or bishop, was ever admitted into the Reductions; that, ‘with strange deceit,’ the Spanish language was absolutely forbidden; that the Indians were trained to an unlimited, blind obedience, kept in the most ‘extraordinary ignorance,’ and the most unsufferable slavery ever known, and under a complete despotism as to body and soul; that they did not know there was any other sovereign in the world than the fathers, and knew nothing of the king, or any other law than the will of the ‘holy fathers;’ that the Indians were taught that white laymen adored gold, had a devil in their bodies, were the enemies of the Indians, and of the images which they adored; that they would destroy their altars, and offer sacrifices of their women and infants; and they were consequently taught to kill white men wherever they could find them, and to be careful to cut off their heads, lest they should come to life again.”
http://books.google.com/books?jtp=186&id=I3ESAAAAIAAJ#v=onepage&q&f=false
One can even see today that the dominant Liberation Theology taught in Liberal seminaries comes from Gustavo Gutiérrez, a Jesuit trained Domincan monk. His Jesuit instructor was a Frenchman named Henri de Lubac.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustavo_Guti%C3%A9rrez
Then of course we have the devastating history behind the creation of communism. It was clearly created by the Jesuits.
http://drakeshelton.com/2012/01/18/the-jesuit-roots-of-socialism-and-communism/
Thomas Aquinas says,
“The second thing that is competent to man with regard to external things is their use. On this respect man ought to possess external things, not as his own, but as common, so that, to wit, he is ready to communicate them to others in their need. Hence the Apostle says (1 Timothy 6:17-18): “Charge the rich of this world . . . to give easily, to communicate to others,” etc.
Reply to Objection 1. Community of goods is ascribed to the natural law, not that the natural law dictates that all things should be possessed in common and that nothing should be possessed as one’s own: but because the division of possessions is not according to the natural law, but rather arose from human agreement which belongs to positive law, as stated above (57, 2,3). Hence the ownership of possessions is not contrary to the natural law, but an addition thereto devised by human reason.
Reply to Objection 2. A man would not act unlawfully if by going beforehand to the play he prepared the way for others: but he acts unlawfully if by so doing he hinders others from going. On like manner a rich man does not act unlawfully if he anticipates someone in taking possession of something which at first was common property, and gives others a share: but he sins if he excludes others indiscriminately from using it. Hence Basil says (Hom. in Luc. xii, 18): “Why are you rich while another is poor, unless it be that you may have the merit of a good stewardship, and he the reward of patience?”
Summa Theologica, Second Part of the Second Part, Question 66, Article 2,
http://www.newadvent.org/summa/3066.htm#article7
and again,
“On the contrary, In cases of need all things are common property, so that there would seem to be no sin in taking another’s property, for need has made it common.”
Ibid., Article 7
I have admitted and will continue to admit that the Jews are a problem.
http://drakeshelton.com/2012/08/19/is-gary-north-a-jesuit-temporal-coadjutor-case-studies-in-the-contemporary-lust-for-filthy-lucre-in-the-reformed-church/
Most of them though are Freemasons which tells me they have a massa in Rome. Freemasonry was created by the Jesuits to regain the Stuart Throne in England after their downfall with the Glorious revolution.
Albert Mackey says in his Encyclopedia of Freemasonry and its Kindred Sciences (McClure Publishing Co.: Philadelphia, 1917), page 134-135,
“Bode, Johann Joachim Christoph.
Born in Brunswick, 18th of January, 1730. One of the most distinguished Masons of his time. . . . in 1757 he established himself at Hamburg as a bookseller, and was initiated into the Masonic Order.. . . To Masonic literature he made many valuable contributions; among others, he translated from the French Bonneville’s celebrated work entitled Les Jesuites chasses de la Maconnerie et leur poignard brise par les Macons, which contains a comparison of Scottish Masonry with the Templarism of the fourteenth century. In 1790 he joined the order of the Illuminati, obtaining the highest degree in its second class, and at the Congress of Wilhelmsbad he advocated the opinions of Weishaupt. No man of his day was better versed than he in the history of Freemasonry, or possessed a more valuable and extensive library; no one was more diligent in increasing his stock of Masonic knowledge, or more anxious to avail himself of the rarest sources of learning. Hence, he has always held an exhalted position among the Masonic scholars of Germany. The theory which he had conceived on the origin of Freemasonry—a theory however, which the investigations of subsequent historians have proved to be untenable [Consider the source-DS]-was that the Order was invented by the Jesuits, in the seventeenth century, as an instrument for the re-establishment of the Roman Church in England, covering it for their own purposes under the mantle of Templarism.”
http://books.google.com/books?id=A2ZMSStxzW8C&printsec=frontcover&dq=Albert+Mackey,+Encyclopedia+of+Freemasonry+and+its+Kindred+Sciences&source=bl&ots=N830JQrsmk&sig=UL-dRdnS1XZ6ZehsTCgI9KanwaI&hl=en&sa=X&ei=72h2UPb-Mobo9ATclIDICA&ved=0CDEQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false
Templarism is Freemasonry and Templarism is ROMAN CATHOLICISM.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knights_Templar
Templarism was the Zionist movement before the Jesuits and the Alumbrados, with the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem. All Catholic Not Jew.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Leave a Response »
-1-.jpg)
Anglo Judaizer 