Military Government and Martial Law by William Birkhimer, Saturday, Jan 25 2014 

Military Government and Martial Law by  William Birkhimer, United States Army Brigadier General, Esquire

https://archive.org/details/militarygovmt00birk

Here we see that the martial process we havein American courts was perfected in the Philippines in the late 19th and early 20th century.

Is Our Present Government a Military Coup D’état? Monday, Sep 23 2013 

Growing up in America can be one strange experience. If you are the kind of person who actually cares to know things, the lies we are told in childhood grow darker and darker in our perception as the years pass by.  As we see our Country growing more ignorant and more chaotic and our Government growing more tyrannical, these childhood lies seem more monstrous and malicious than we ever imagined. We are told in childhood that 150 years ago, Northerners loved Black Americans and Southerners hated them and persecuted them, and so our Country fought for the freedom of Black Americans. Not to divert from the topic of this tract, having written a couple books on these issues, I can assure you that this is a total lie. The Northern states were the ones who brought Africans here in the first place. Our original Colony of Virginia did everything they could to legally prevent slave traders from coming to our shores and King George forced it upon us. Jefferson catalogs this in our original Constitution of Virginia. This is a piece of History that our State Schools systematically suppress.  However, this only scratches the surface. The intention of our invasion 150 years ago was not to work for the benefit of Black Americans, but to subject all Americans to Monarchial powers and to create an American Empire totally unrecognizable from the original Government created by the Founding Fathers. This new creation is heralded as the glowing gem of human Civilization and freedom when it is anything but. Americans are starting to wake up to this fact in the recent egregious violations of our 4th Amendment Rights.  Let me be clear, the present Government of the United States of America is not a development of the original Government of 1789. The present Government of the United States of America is an utter rejection of the original Government of 1789. Why do I say this?

1. George H. Pendleton, who was a Democrat and a Representative and a Senator from Ohio, himself a Yankee, said,

“Now the veil is drawn and the revolutionary purpose of the party is revealed. That purpose is to destroy the government, to change its form and spirit, to make a new Union, to ingraft upon it new principles, new theories, new powers. It is rebellion against the Constitution, differing in nothing from its armed enemies except in the weapons of its warfare.”[1]

2. 14th Amendment Citizenship abolished State Sovereignty. James Gillespie Blaine (1830 – 1893), U.S. Representative and Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, said in his Political Discussions (1887) pg. 63-64,

“We intend to make citizenship National. Heretofore, a man has been a citizen of the United States because he was a citizen of some one of the States: Now, we propose to reverse that, and make him a citizen of any State where he chooses to reside, by defining in advance his National citizenship — and our Amendment declares that ‘all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the States wherein they reside.’ ”

This overturned the Dred Scott decision as explained in Slaughterhouse Cases – 83 U.S. 36 (1872).[2]

3. 14th Amendment Citizenship does not include Privileges and Immunities of the Bill of Rights.

Maxwell v. Dow – 176 U.S. 581 (1900) says,

“The privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States do not necessarily include all the rights protected by the first eight amendments to the Federal Constitution against the powers of the Federal Government…”

Twining v. State – 211 U.S. 78 (1908) says,

“The right of trial by jury in civil cases, guaranteed by the Seventh Amendment (Walker v. Sauvinet,  92 U.S. 90), and the right to bear arms guaranteed by the Second Amendment (Presser v. Illinois, 116 U.S. 252), have been distinctly held not to be privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment against abridgment by the State…”[3]

4. Our present Government is a De Facto Military Government ruling the States as conquered territories treating the Citizens as belligerent enemy combatants. Downes v. Bidwell – 182 U.S. 244 (1901) says,

“What the Chief Justice said was:

“These courts, then, are not constitutional courts in which the judicial power conferred by the Constitution on the general government can be deposited. They are incapable of receiving it. They are legislative courts, created in virtue of the general right of sovereignty which exists in the government…The jurisdiction with which they are invested is not a part of that judicial power which is defined in the third article of the Constitution, but is conferred by Congress in the execution of those general powers which that body possesses over the territories of the United States.”

Justice Harlan referred to this as “an era of legislative absolutism”. He continues in his dissent saying,

“The idea prevails with some — indeed, it found expression in arguments at the bar — that we have in this country substantially or practically two national governments — one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions, the other to be maintained by Congress outside and independently of that instrument, by exercising such powers as other nations of the earth are accustomed to exercise.”

Ex parte Milligan – 71 U.S. 2 (1866) says, 

“There are under the Constitution three kinds of military jurisdiction: one to be exercised both in peace and war, another to be exercised in time of foreign war without the boundaries of the United States, or in time of rebellion and civil war within states or districts occupied by rebels treated as belligerents…”

Notice how our beloved Government changed the wording of this case in Constitutional Sources of the Laws of War, 65th Congress, 1st Session, Document No. 86, Senate Resolution No. 100 (1917),

“And whenever our Army or Navy may go beyond our territorial limits, neither can go beyond the authority of the President or the legislation of Congress. There are under the Constitution three kinds of military jurisdiction: One to be exercised both in peace and war; another to be exercised in time of foreign war within the boundaries of the United States, or in time of rebellion and civil war within States or districts occupied by rebels treated as belligerents…”[4]

What the Supreme Court ruled to be a prerogative of the Military outside of the United States, Congress made to apply inside the boundaries of the United States.

5. The Gold-Fringed-Flag that stands behind the Judges in American courts prove we are under Military rule, not civilian rule. Army Regulation 840–10; Heraldic Activities Flags, Guidons, Streamers, Tabards, and Automobile and Aircraft Plates, states,

“b. National flags listed below are for indoor display and for use in ceremonies and parades. For these purposes, the flag of the United States will be of rayon banner cloth or heavyweight nylon, trimmed on three sides with golden yellow fringe…c. Authorization for indoor display. The flag of the United States is authorized for indoor display for each… (4) Military courtroom…”[5]

6. Daylight Savings Time is Considered War Time (The War Time Act-56 Stat. 9, ch. 7).  In 1942 Congress passed The War Time Act establishing DST to conserve energy resources during WW2. DST is still with us today.

7. We are in a perpetual state of National Emergency and a State of National Emergency is a State of War. Our state of National Emergency began with FDR’s The Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933.  Black’s Law Dictionary, 5th Edition (1979), page 90 states,

National emergency. A state of national crises…Congress has made little or no distinction between a ‘state of national emergency’ and a ‘state of war’.

Thus, pursuant to the meaning of a National Emergency, FDR, in fact, enacted a state of war. What evidence is there that this state of war extended into the future? In Emergency Powers Statutes, 93d Congress, 1st Session, Report No. 93-549 (1973), we read,

“Since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency.”

Moreover, Order Code 98-505 GOV, National Emergency Powers, Updated September 18, 2001, by Harold C. Relyea, CRS-13 Table 1 demonstrates that our government has declared a National Emergency almost every year from 1979 to the year of this publication in 2001. The report states,

“The special committee also found that no process existed for automatically terminating the four outstanding national emergency proclamations. [CRS 9-10] …The development, exercise, and regulation of emergency powers, from the days of the Continental Congress to the present, reflect at least one highly discernable trend: those authorities available to the executive in time of national crisis or exigency have, since the time of the Lincoln Administration, come to be increasingly rooted in statutory law. The discretion available to a Civil War President in his exercise of emergency power has been harnessed, to a considerable extent, in the contemporary period.” [CRS-18]

8. The United States Government advertises itself openly as a Fascist Military Government by the traditional Fascist Symbol in the House of Representatives.  The title image of this tract bears this out.

[1] Woodburn, James Albert, The Life of Thaddeus Stevens: A Study in American Political History, 313-314

[2] See also Colgate v. Harvey, 296 U.S. 404 (1935)

[3] See also Justice Harlan’s dissent.

[4] Pg. 12

The American Income Tax; Our Participation in Global Genocide Monday, Sep 23 2013 

The Disney Production was also produced and approved by the US Department of Treasury.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Spirit

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0035120/

At the end of the cartoon we see that our Income Taxes will “keep democracy on the march!” Now who is interested in global Democracy? The Roman Catholic Church.  On May 5, 1903, Archbishop Quigley bragged about the power of the Roman Catholic Church. Quigley stated,

“Within twenty years this country is going to rule the world. Kings and Emperors will soon pass away and the democracy of the United States will take their place…When the United States rules the world, the Catholic Church will rule the world…Nothing can stand against the Church. I’d like to see the politician who would try to rule against the Church in Chicago. His reign would be short indeed.”

http://olivianus.thekingsparlor.com/concerning-roman-catholicism/archbishop-quigley-s-confession

This is exactly what the United States and its CIA has been doing for decades. They have been overthrowing governments all over the world and replacing them with “democracies” administered by puppet rulers. Ron Paul exposed some of this in his speeches concerning Blowback.

 

 

%d bloggers like this: