Chris Pinto Exposes the Sexual Revolution Friday, Jan 31 2014 



Blame Whitey!; Inequality: Based on Racial Hate or Racial Facts? Wednesday, Jan 29 2014 

[Thanks to Jared Taylor for his tremendous work and help on this topic.]

When I was growing up in the public school system I was assaulted on numerous occasions by mostly black young men but also Latino kids as well. I will never forget my Sophomore year in High School when a young black man named Demetrius, who had already assaulted numerous other white people in class, stopped by my desk in the middle of class. He looked right at me and purposefully dropped his pencil on the ground. He looked at me and said, “pick it up!” I looked at him and said, “I’m not picking that up.” He then grabbed me by the back of my neck and shoved my face into the ground right next to where the pencil was. Take note, this is in the middle of class. The whole class is watching, including the teacher. Demetrius said, “pick it up bitch!” The teacher watched the whole thing and did nothing, and so did everyone else. I did nothing, because, as I had been taught, I was an evil white Southerner, born in Mississippi, and I deserved this. All the assaults in Elementary School that traumatized me for years, as of course, I was blamed and made to feel like a complete monster for defending myself from the just punishment that was due to my race, were just the beginning. As I have grown into adulthood and have been made aware that 99% of the things people say are usually infused with some degree of bullshit, I have questioned the things I was taught growing up, seeing they were the occasion for extreme trauma and violence in my childhood. It took me 30 years to stir up the courage to face these terrifying subjects, but as I have, they have fallen like Scarecrows and crumbled in my hand as the straw they are.  The basic fact is, the reason why blacks are not as well off as whites, and face extreme social breakdown in their communities, is not because of white oppression. It is because black people forced themselves onto white people, using their bodyguard, the Yankee federal Government, and this integration was the occasion for a mass exodus of wealthy and educated blacks from black communities [Roy L. Brooks, Integration or Separation (Harvard University Press: Cambridge, Mass. 1996), 104-106], and last but not least, blacks just do not have the same abilities as white people. I already pointed to the history of this here,  but now I want to consider some modern statistics.

We read from The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, “The Widening Racial Scoring Gap on the SAT College Admissions Test”,

“In 2005 the average black score on the combined math and verbal portions of the SAT test was 864. The mean white score on the combined math and verbal SAT was 1068, 17 percent higher.

In 1988 the combined mean score for blacks on both the math and verbal portions of the SAT was 847. By 2005 the average black score had risen only 17 points, or about 1.4 percent, to 864.

Despite the small overall improvement of black SAT scores over the past 17 years, the gap between black and white scores has actually increased. In 1988 the average combined score for whites of 1036 was 189 points higher than the average score for blacks. In 2005 the gap between the average white score and the average black score had grown to 204 points.

Not only are African-American scores on the SAT far below the scores of whites and Asian Americans, but they also trail the scores of every other major ethnic group in the United States including students of Puerto Rican and Mexican backgrounds. In fact, American Indian and Alaska Native students on average score more than 104 points higher than the average score of black students. On average, Asian American students score 227 points, or 19 percent higher, higher than African Americans.”

I would also draw the readers attention to this graph from the same article where we read,

blackeducation gap

“Almost No Blacks Have SAT Scores Equal to the Median Score of Whites at the nation’s Highest-Ranked Universities. IN Fact, Whites Outnumber Blacks at the Highest-Scoring Levels by About 40 to 1.”

As soon as these devastating facts are made known, the perpetrator of white guilt and racial hatred in America will say that the low income level of blacks, a product of white supremacy,  explains why these gaps persist. The article continues,

Explaining the Black-White SAT Gap

There are a number of reasons that are being advanced to explain the continuing and growing black-white SAT scoring gap. Sharp differences in family incomes are a major factor. Always there has been a direct correlation between family income and SAT scores. For both blacks and whites, as income goes up, so do test scores. In 2005, 28 percent of all black SAT test takers were from families with annual incomes below $20,000. Only 5 percent of white test takers were from families with incomes below $20,000. At the other extreme, 7 percent of all black test takers were from families with incomes of more than $100,000. The comparable figure for white test takers is 27 percent.

But there is a major flaw in the thesis that income differences explain the racial gap. Consider these three observable facts from The College Board’s 2005 data on the SAT:

• Whites from families with incomes of less than $10,000 had a mean SAT score of 993. This is 129 points higher than the national mean for all blacks.

• Whites from families with incomes below $10,000 had a mean SAT test score that was 61 points higher than blacks whose families had incomes of between $80,000 and $100,000.

• Blacks from families with incomes of more than $100,000 had a mean SAT score that was 85 points below the mean score for whites from all income levels, 139 points below the mean score of whites from families at the same income level, and 10 points below the average score of white students from families whose income was less than $10,000.”

As we see, the perpetrator of white guilt and racial hatred in America, is wrong. The fact is, there are differences in nature that Yahweh has ordained between the races. The black race is generally more physically superior and athletic while the white race is generally more intellectual and bookish. There is no doubt that the environment in which we live influences our behavior, but that is not to ignore the differences that Yahweh has placed in nature.

A bit more evidence:

Linda S. Gottfredson at the School of Education at the University of Delaware, in her Social Consequences of Group Differences in Cognitive Ability, page 42,

bellcurve distinctions

shows that blacks are four times as likely as whites to have an IQ less than 75 and that whites are 30 times more likely to have an IQ greater than 125. She also shows how this affects what professions these distinctions in nature qualify for. The greater the IQ the better paying job one is generally going to attain.

Now, a reader may mistakenly think that this article is intended to inflame the emotions of black readers. Just the opposite! This article is intended to show that the reason why the black community is in the poor shape it is in, is not the fault of Southern white people. Black people made a terrible decision with integration that robbed their communities of human resources, and secondly, black people simply do not have the same abilities as white people do. I completely understand that there are some dear, civilized, upstanding black people in the South, who have the pride to pull their own weight and not take their problems out on white people through violence and intimidation. I currently know young black men whom I have the up-most of respect for. However, the majority black population, are men like Demetrius, who are inflamed with hatred for white people, believing white people to be responsible for all of their problems. They are abusing white people all over this country:

and they are driving white people into hateful, violent organizations that you are going to have to face in the near future. If you don’t start telling your people the truth, you have no one to blame but yourself for the tribulations that are coming in the near future.

Rothschild Family; the Vatican Bankers Tuesday, Jan 28 2014 

The Jewish Encyclopedia states,

“It is a somewhat curious sequel to the attempt to set up a Catholic competitor to the Roths-childs that at the present time the latter are the guardians of the papal treasure.”

21 Proofs Christians Hate the Bible Monday, Jan 27 2014 

Mat. 5:17 Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets

Rom. 3:31 Do we then make void the law through faith? Certainly not! On the contrary, we establish the law.

Rom. 7:12 Therefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy and just and good.

Rom. 7:14 For we know that the law is spiritual, but I am carnal, sold under sin.

Rom. 7:22 For I delight in the law of God according to the inward man.

Christians of all shapes and sizes, for all their thousands of factions and doctrinal divisions, share a basic uniform assumption about the Bible that they all learned from the Catholic Church: The Jewish/Hebrew law, and the unique significance of the Jewish/Hebrew people, though the basis for the entire ontological, cosmological, epistemic, ethical and political system of the Bible, was abrogated, and replaced by the Gentile Church and its accompanying Greco-Roman Philosophical tradition at the resurrection of the Messiah. The Catholic Church would invent a new heresy known as “Judaizing” in its Synod of Laodicea. Canon 29 states, “Christians must not judaize by resting on the Sabbath, but must work on that day, rather honouring the Lord’s Day; and, if they can, resting then as Christians.  But if any shall be found to be judaizers, let them be anathema from Christ.” A 7th century Catholic Profession of Faith required the catechumen to profess, “in one word, I renounce absolutely everything Jewish.”[1] This came to be known as Replacement Theology. The Catechism of the Catholic Church (TCOCC) 751 states that the “Church, the first community of Christian believers recognized itself as heir to” the Nation of Israel. An heir is someone who receives the property of someone else at their death. This implies that the Nation of Israel is no more and has been replaced by the Catholic Church. TCOCC 1962 states, “The Old Law is the first stage of revealed Law. Its moral prescriptions are summed up in the Ten Commandments.” This is all a game though because the Catholic Church makes many images and worships them, the holy name of Yahuwah is not spoken by its people, and the Sabbath is not kept in this Church. So they believe, neither the second, the third, nor the fourth commandments. However, the Catholic Church would invent another category of law in order to justify their disobedience to most of the Bible: Ceremonial Law. TCOCC 582 states, “Jesus perfects the dietary law, so important in Jewish daily life, by revealing its pedagogical meaning through a divine interpretation: “Whatever goes into a man from outside cannot defile him. . . (Thus he declared all foods clean.).”[2] TCOCC 2174  states, “Jesus rose from the dead “on the first day of the week…For Christians it has become the first of all days, the first of all feasts, the Lord’s Day Sunday: We all gather on the day of the sun”.[3] TCOCC 2175 states, “Sunday…for Christians its ceremonial observance replaces that of the sabbath.”

TCOCC 2176 states, “Sunday worship fulfills the moral command of the Old Covenant, taking up its rhythm and spirit in the weekly celebration of the Creator and Redeemer of his people”. TCOCC 2177 states, “Also to be observed are the day of the Nativity of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the Epiphany, the Ascension of Christ, the feast of the Body and Blood of Christi, the feast of Mary the Mother of God, her Immaculate Conception, her Assumption, the feast of Saint Joseph, the feast of the Apostles Saints Peter and Paul, and the feast of All Saints.”

TCOCC 1340 states, “By celebrating the Last Supper with his apostles in the course of the Passover meal, Jesus gave the Jewish Passover its definitive meaning. [Definitive denotes its abrogation. DS] Jesus’ passing over to his father by his death and Resurrection, the new Passover, is anticipated in the Supper and celebrated in the Eucharist, which fulfills [Replaces. DS] the Jewish Passover”. TCOCC 527 states, “Jesus’ circumcision…is the sign of his incorporation into Abraham’s descendants, into the people of the covenant. It is the sign of his submission to do the Law…This sign prefigures that “circumcision of Christ” which is Baptism.”

So here we see the Catholic Church doing everything it can, not to adopt the Jewish faith, and be grafted into the Olive Tree of the Abrahamic Covenant of Grace[4] but to abrogate and replace it with its own Greco-Roman inventions. The Renewed Covenant of Jer.31:31-32 will be replaced by Christianity’s New Testament.  The Nation of Israel will be replaced by the Gentile Church. The Hebrew Gospels and the Hebrew writings of Rav Shaul,[5] will be replaced by Greek manuscripts.  The Unitarianism of the Tanach will be replaced by the pagan Triune Godhead of Christianity, directly contradicted by the Torah,[6] which ultimately worships a monad huperousia pursuant to Plotinus’ Enneads 6 and 9. Following from this the Hebrew names of the creator and the messiah, Yahuwah and Yehoshuwah will be replaced by a Generic title: God, and the name of the Greek deity Iasos later to be translated Jesus. The Torah and all the hundreds of relational, political and economic laws revealed by Yahuwah himself will be replaced by pagan Monasticism, Asceticism, and Feudalism. The Sabbath day, which was sanctified and blessed by Yahuwah in the second chapter of the Bible as an integral part of the created order, will be replaced by the day of the Sun. The annual Sabbaths of the fall and spring feasts will be replaced by the Catholic Church’s liturgical calendar, celebrating the Bohemian pagan Christmas, the pagan celebrations of Astarte and her mystical Easter egg, and the pagan celebration of Halloween. The Protestant Christians, following Rome’s Replacement theology, still replace these feasts with their innovation known as The Lord’s Supper. Protestant Christians also follow the Catholic Catechism’s replacement of circumcision with Baptism.[7]  Following from this, the Creator’s calendar, which measures years by the ripe barley, the abib, and holding to Geocentrism, will be replaced by the Solar calendar of Rome and Jesuit Heliocentrism with the Gregorian Calendar. This religion would go on to justify prayer and worship to idols and statues and trinkets and a legion of other grotesque and abominable insanities explicitly condemned in the Torah. The past 150 years has seen an even bigger failure in Christianity to maintain any kind of religious order in Western Civilization following the Communist revolutions of the 18th and 19th centuries. Without the Hierarchy of the Catholic Church, the baseless, arbitrary theology of Christianity fell like a stack of dry leaves in the face of Marx and Engels’ wicked brilliance. The Torah established a Theocratic Republic[8] which killed anyone who prophesied falsely and promoted worship of another God.[9] This is a direct contradiction to the allegiance modern Christians have to the French Revolution’s doctrines of absolute religious toleration and freedom of speech. The Torah taught that the racial tribe of the Hebrews was more significant than any other people on the earth.[10]  Paul repeats this racial supremacy in his writings,[11] acknowledging the God-given racial privileges of the Jewish people.[12] Modern Christians reject this with their belief that all men are created equal. The Torah, though bestowing equal administrations of justice,[13] affirmed supremacies of privilege and franchise. Yahuwah gave Levites privileges and responsibilities no other class had. However, they were not given franchises other classes enjoyed.[14] The first-born son is given an unearned portion of inheritance.[15] Not only is  slavery condoned in the Bible, a person of Hebrew blood could only be enslaved for six years while a person of foreign blood could be held in hereditary slavery.[16] No mechanistic equality. The Gibeonites, though given administrations of justice,[17] were second class citizens in the Nation of Israel.[18] Women are regarded as the property of either their husband or father,[19] could only inherit property if there was no male heir[20] and are as a gender clearly referred to as ontologically subordinate to men.[21] Women are also to hold no teaching office in the religious assemblies.[22] Modern Christian women especially despise the Bible’s teaching on Head Coverings.[23] Paul teaches in Rom. 13:1-5 that Governments are established by Yahuwah. Modern Christians, in direct defiance of the Bible, following the French thinkers, say that Governments are established by the people. The Bible also condones the right of the state to physically enforce morality on the population.[24]  While some Fascist Christians do believe this, their Fascism is far too liberal to qualify for a true Bible-believing Philosophy. And finally, the Bible explicitly condemns the modern banking system, which Christian Capitalism glories in, with its prohibition against usury.[25] Thus, as we have seen, Christianity has stayed fundamentally consistent, since the 4th century and John Chrysostom’s Eight Homilies Against the Jews, in demonizing and rejecting everything Jewish. Christians, without any doubt, truly hate the Bible.

[1] Medieval Sourcebook: Professions of Faith Extracted from Jews on Baptism:

[2] This phrase “Thus he declared all foods clean” (Mark 7:19) is not in the bible. The words “Thus he” are italicized meaning they are a scribe’s addition.  The argument is that katharizon must mean “He declared” clean due to its masculine construction instead of neuter. The Christian is relying on a textual variant. The problem is, the way the Christian translates the passage, the word katharizon must be considered an adjective, but the word is a verb. Cleansing and declared clean are very different uses of the word clean. The former is a verb, the latter is an adjective while declared is the verb. Also take into account the cross reference in Mat. 15:17 and the curious absence of the statement, “Thus he declared he declared all foods clean”.

[3] First of all, Messiah did not rise from the dead on the first day of the week. The preparation day on which Messiah died was related to the Passover not the weekly Sabbath; thus it was not Friday. ( John19:14-15) Secondly, the only passage that seems to state (though the wording is not clear) that Messiah rose from the dead on Sunday is Mark 16:9. However, this passage is not in the oldest Greek text Codex Sinaiticus. The fact is, Messiah stated clearly that he would be in the grave 3 days and 3 nights. Mat. 12:40.This is impossible with the Friday to Sunday view of the Christian Church.

[4] Rom. 11:17-24.

[5]The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis. Nazoraeans, 29. Against Nazoraeans 9,4; Eusebius, Church History, Book III, Chapter 24, 6;  Chapter 38, 2; Chapter 39, 16; Book V, Chapter 10, 3; Book VI, Chapter 14, 2; Jerome, Lives of Illustrious Men, Chapters III and V; Edward Gibbon, History of Christianity, 185-186, FN 152.

[6] Deut. 6:4: Christians pray to three persons.

[7]Gal. 2: 3 But not even Titus, who was with me, though he was a Greek, was compelled [Anagkazō] to be circumcised.

Does Paul use this word Anagkazō elsewhere in Galatians so we can see how he is using it? Yes! In Gal. 6: 12 Those who desire to make a good showing in the flesh try to compel [Anagkazō] you to be circumcised, simply so that they will not be persecuted for the cross of Christ. 13 For those who are circumcised do not even keep the Law themselves, but they desire to have you circumcised so that they may boast in your flesh. So here we see that Titus was not compelled to be circumcised, meaning, that he was not pressured into taking circumcision FOR THE PURPOSE OF JUSTIFICATION, thus throwing his lot in with this sect of men who taught that circumcision played a role in justification. (Gal. 5) Paul did not abrogate circumcision.

[8] Exo. 3:16; 18:25-26; Num. 11:16-17, 1 Sam. 8.

[9] Deut. 13.

[10] Deut. 7:6, 14:2, Zech. 2:8.

[11] Rom. 1:16.

[12] Rom. 3:1-2.

[13] Lev. 24:17-20.

[14] Heb. 7:11-13, Num. 18: 21-24.

[15] Deut. 21:15-17.

[16] Exo. 21: 2-6, Deut. 15:12-15, Lev. 25:44-46; Philemon.

[17] 2 Sam. 21:1-6.

[18] Josh. 9:22-27.

[19] Deut. 22:28, Exo. 20:17.

[20] Num. 27:8.

[21]1 Cor.11:3, 1 Pet. 3:5-7, Eph. 5: 22-24, 1 Tim. 5:14, Titus 2:4-5.

[22] 1 Cor. 14:34, 1 Tim. 2:11.

[23] 1 Cor. 11:5-15. Heinrich Ewald, The Antiquities of Israel (1876), 202.

[24] Prov. 18:6, 20:30, 23:13-14, 26:3.

[25] Deut. 23:19

Documentation on the Intellectual Inferiority of the Black Race Saturday, Jan 25 2014 

In John Baker’s book Race (Oxford University Press, Athens, GA, 1981) we read on page 373 that the African black race had no knowledge of the wheel. On pages 394-395 we read that the black race had no written language or calendar. On page 354 that the black race had no knowledge of mechanical devices. On pages 372-373 we read that the black race never figured out how to bind two pieces of wood together and because of this their boats were canoe like having to be carved out of large trees and they did not build bridges by binding wood together using geometric knowledge. The author gives one example of  the “Mittu [who] used a half-shell (single valve) of a freshwater  bivalve mollusc as a bridge for the rababa.” On page 402 we learn that only one incident, and that an ambiguous one, exists for the claim that blacks had the ability to build a two-story building.

Truly the Christian and Communist affirmation that all men are created equal is a violation of the 9th Commandment and an affirmation that continues to plague the white race as blacks see themselves as equals and yet know they are not as well off as the white race. Instead of coming to the true conclusion that they do not have the same ability as whites, they chalk it up to the conspiracy of white supremacy and white oppression. This gives them justification to commit violent acts against white people.

Catholic Education Website Worships George III Saturday, Jan 25 2014 

Along with worshiping the man, they also point out a very important piece of history,

“While some of our Founding Fathers defended or ignored the Reign of Terror, King George was singular in fighting against the French Revolution. He granted refuge to thousands of Catholic clergy and laity, and he later cooperated with the Holy See in opposing Napoleon…. While some of our Founding Fathers defended or ignored the Reign of Terror, King George was singular in fighting against the French Revolution. He granted refuge to thousands of Catholic clergy and laity, and he later cooperated with the Holy See in opposing Napoleon. His Prime Minister Castlereagh was a close friend and host of the Papal Secretary of State, Cardinal Consalivi, whose portrait hangs in Windsor Castle. The King’s relations with the Pontiffs were benign. He funded the Stuart memorial in St. Peter’s Basilica, and in 1807, he granted Cardinal Henry Benedict Stuart, last of his line, the immense annuity of £4,000.”

As I have pointed out many times, this man was in league with the Papists in destroying us as a Protestant people pursuant to the Counter-Reformation.

A Papist to the End; Never Question Where George Bush’s Allegiances Lied Saturday, Jan 25 2014 

The Corruption of Protestant England by Charles II and his Jesuit Servants Saturday, Jan 25 2014 

This History can be read in Ridpath’s Universal History, Volume 14, starting at page 411:

The Earth Is Not Moving by Marshall Hall Saturday, Jan 25 2014

Bruce Cathie, Harmonic 33 and the Airborne Nuclear War Hoax Saturday, Jan 25 2014 

Next Page »

%d bloggers like this: