It is often the refuge of liberals who criticize Feminism, when pressed to acknowledge the definition of Feminism as the social equality of the male and female gender, to proclaim the equality of the sexes  but denounce modern Feminism as not a movement of equality but of man-hating in pursuit of supremacy.  What these naïve liberals do not understand is that Feminism, from its beginning, has been luxuriously garbed in a robe of man-hating in pursuit of social supremacy. Let us take into consideration some of the quotations from the famous Declaration of Sentiments, where we read in its opening  theses:

“The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her.”

Absolute Tyranny?! Knowing that the traditional wife had her husband’s ear, and in many circumstances a royal ear at that, in a way exponentially more influential and advantageous than most men and regarding her husband, more influential than even his Pastor, the Declaration, in a direct attempt to incite hatred among the sexes states,

“Having deprived her of this first right of a citizen, the elective franchise, thereby leaving her without representation in the halls of legislation, he has oppressed her on all sides.”

Oppressed her on all sides? How is it that our people have fallen for such deliberately pathetic invective? It next refers to the woman as “civilly dead”!  Not silent; not ignored; no…………dead!  The Declaration next attempts to accuse man of theft  from a person he was entirely responsible for in matters material. It then refers to the marriage relationship as slavery, referring to a husband as “to all intents and purposes, her master”.  In a deliberate attempt to incite hatred toward men the Declaration states,

“He has endeavored, in every way that he could to destroy her confidence in her own powers, to lessen her self-respect, and to make her willing to lead a dependent and abject life.”

Abject? Do you know what abject means reader? In my Merriam-Webster’s dictionary the first definition of this word is “extremely bad or severe”.  I couldn’t ask for a clearer attempt to incite hatred toward men than this tripe!

Thus, it is utterly pathetic and a direct attempt to avoid the humble pie that Bible believers such as myself have prepared for liberals,  that these naive cowards reject the modern Feminist movement. They know that admitting the failure of equality is a huge vindication of Southern Protestant “Racists”, “Sexists” and “Fascists”. The sad part is, their pride is more important to them than the happiness of the next generation.  A sad reality that many Americans have suffered under for a long time.

Southern Israelite